In this day and age, the entire world has transformed into a global
village, seemingly becoming smaller as advancements in technology, such
as the embracement of Web 2.0 and the many innovations from Technology,
Entertainment, Design (TED) conferences, all bring us closer to one another.
As demand for cheaper connectivity soars due to the currently exorbitant
prices of oil, which have hit US$120 a barrel leading to more expensive air
travel, the people that connect us like Skype have engineered feats such as
low-cost video-conferencing. And as many more examples of connectivity
may be rattled off, we can thus see that globalisation is indeed reaching its
peak as its sphere of influence spreads due to technological advancement.
However, the impact of this phenomenon is quite human-centred. With
globalisation, people all over the world imbibe and partake in a cultural
experience contributed by the many diverse groups of people on this planet,
and it is thus the extent to which we have been affected by this cultural
experience that determines our global-mindedness. As such, in the context of
Singapore, though it may be obvious that we are globally connected, it
remains to be seen whether we have truly been shaped by this global
cultural experience as a society.
With the increasing connectivity, Singaporeans are exposed to many
media platforms that transmit information about global issues, such as
television, radio, the Internet, newspapers and magazines. This has allowed
many here to be more globally aware, and to keep in touch with current
affairs around the world which may or may not affect us. Nonetheless, this
phenomenon has since removed us from the close-mindedness that many
societies face, especially in developing countries. The Democrats’
nomination campaigns for their potential presidential candidates, for
example, have been closely followed by many Singaporeans, due in part to
wide coverage in news media. This has resulted in Singaporeans even being
able to be part of this electoral process, endorsing candidates of their own
whether it being the frontrunners Obama or Clinton, and experiencing a part
of the political process that many young Singaporeans have never
experienced before. The outpouring of compassion as seen by the many
generous private donations to aid disaster victims of the Sichuan earthquake
or Cyclone Nargis in Myanmar is also testament to the nation’s civic-
mindedness in the global arena. Such is the extent of globalisation that has
allowed our people to be aware of various global events, and even partake
of this experiences that these provide.
On a lighter note, many in Singapore have also been part of a different
global cultural experience. With connectivity, knowledge of consumer
culture has also descended upon our shores, seen by the many savvy
consumers who are very in touch with fashion trends and imported waves. So
strong is this fascination that many world-renowned retail outlets have set up
flagship stores here, as seen in the clothing label Gap having set up one here
as well as luxury goods retailer Louis Vuitton. While these may seem superficial
and possibly scoffed at by detractors who will argue that this has nothing to
do with globalisation, it has to be noted that many anthropologists and
sociologists deem consumer culture as perhaps one of the largest
determinants of the extent of globalisation, given that the desire to possess
and own something is very human in nature. Hence, surprisingly, it is our
voracious shopping culture, which especially takes a shine to our imported
goods, that has increased our “global quotient”, and perhaps may qualify us
to be at least semblances of a global citizen.
One also begins to realise how cosmopolitan and global we really are
as a country. Besides consumer culture that has been assumed into our very
own, our local community carries many international flavours too. Many
expatriates have increasingly flocked to our shores naming safety,
cleanliness, stability and the largely global culture here as the main draws,
persuading many multi-national corporations to set up regional headquarters
here. This may be seen by the burgeoning educational institutions here such
as the Tanglin Trust and the Australian International School, that have begun
to hunt for local opportunities, and the Global Indian International School
campuses. Even local schools have become quasi-international schools, such
as MacPherson Primary School which boasts many nationalities studying
there, as more expatriates bring their families over. It is perhaps these growing
communities of foreigners in Singapore that have contributed to the global
mind-set that we possess today, as we begin to shake off our colonial past
and become more accepting of other cultures, and even religions. Perhaps,
government policy like that of the promotion of facial and religious harmony
and the gracious acceptance of foreign talent into our shores has helped us
to become people with cosmopolitan mind-sets.
Yet, one also begins to question the authenticity of our supposed
global-mindedness, and whether this qualifies us to be fully-fledged global
citizens. Even as we embrace opportunities to go for overseas study stints to
engage in international experiences, these may be misinterpreted by others
to be a fixation with a global education to boost one’s career opportunities.
Therefore, anger over foreign talent “stealing jobs” has also been an issue,
though it has subsided considerably over the last year. Nonetheless, it is sign
of unhappiness at the phenomenon that is labelled inevitable: globalisation.
Is Singapore truly global-minded, when we have been labelled “ugly”
Singaporeans due to our lack of social graces when travelling abroad? And
are we truly embracing global culture, when we celebrate music icons from
all over the world, and yet many of us are full of disdain for the future that is
attached to the entertainment, like deviant sexual orientation? While one
cannot fully embrace all of these and transform into an entity that fully lives
and breathes global culture and forget one’s own local identity, Singapore
still has some way to go before it may be labelled a country of global citizens.
We have succeeded on many fronts in trying to re-orientate our citizens as
global citizens, with the many initiatives to inject international flavours such as
the upcoming Formula One night race this September and the successful bid
for the Youth Olympic Games 2010, to create a more vibrant nightlife and
revive the spirit of sport within the community and especially of youth,
respectively. Nonetheless, there are many traits that will, for a long time,
define us as Singaporeans, such as the “kiasu” mentality of the fear of losing
and the general pragmatism of the local population and of global citizens.
Hence, while we may not be able to claim the full mantle of values
and traits a global citizen embodies, we cam say that we have at least
imbibed a little of the global cultural experience to at least survive in this
increasingly globalised world. That said, it is definite that while being a part of
global citizens is essentially positive, to be a global citizen and lose touch with
one’s local or indigenous cultural identity is an immense loss. It would be a
pure shame for one to be able to identify so well with global culture and yet
not belong to a certain community. There is no true global community, for
the record, as each individual has his or her own cultural baggage that will
indirectly influence whatever global identity he or she assumes. As such, while
people in my country may not be true global citizens who assume an entirely
global identity, we can at least say that we have taken part in what is
labelled the global cultural experience, and that, I believe, is all we will ever
need.
0 comments:
Post a Comment